Case file · File · Prove All Things

The Doctors Who Examined Padre Pio

“But prove all things; hold fast that which is good.” — 1 Thessalonians 5:21, Douay-Rheims

The case

In 1918, an Italian Capuchin friar got wounds in his hands, his feet and his side. His name was Padre Pio. Word spread fast, and so did the doubts. First came the doctors. Luigi Romanelli, chief doctor at a Barletta hospital, examined him in May 1919.

The evidence

Every quotation below is printed in the words of the edition named under it. Nothing is paraphrased.

“chief physician of the City Hospital of Barletta”
Encyclopedia of World Biography (Gale), on Luigi Romanelli — read it at the source
“sceptical of any religious or paranormal origin”
Psi Encyclopedia, Society for Psychical Research, citing Castelli 2011, on Amico Bignami, pathologist of the University of Rome — read it at the source
“might have been kept open artificially through the continuous use of tincture of iodine”
Psi Encyclopedia, Society for Psychical Research, citing Castelli 2011, on Amico Bignami, pathologist of the University of Rome — read it at the source

His hypothesis.

“it has not found any supernatural nature in the facts attributed to Padre Pio”
the Holy Office, 31 May 1923, in the official timeline of the Shrine of St Pio — read it at the source

Not confirmed - not a verdict of fake.

“deprived of all exercises of his priestly duties except Mass, which he may celebrate privately”
the official timeline of the Shrine of St Pio, 23 May 1931 — read it at the source
“But prove all things; hold fast that which is good.”
1 Thessalonians 5:21 (Douay) — read it at the source

What’s established, and what isn’t

What the sources support, claim by claim — each one checked against the sources listed at the foot of this page:

Where the record stops short:

For your men’s group

  1. The Church tested him for years before it honoured him. Why is that slowness a mercy rather than an insult?
  2. He was barred from hearing confessions and obeyed. When has obedience cost you something you thought you were owed?
  3. The cause judged his virtue, not his wounds. Which of the two would you rather be known for?

Every source

Found an error? [email protected] — errata corrected the day they’re found.

Drafted with AI assistance, founder-directed, and checked against the sources linked here. Our editorial standards.

← All case files · The Library · Next case: The Roman Who Hated Us