The Scriptorium

Rebuke Me Not in Thy Indignation: The First of the Seven Penitential Psalms

Psalm 6 (DRB numbering; Ps 6 in modern English Bibles) · Douay-Rheims

Read on Day 6 of the plan.

"O Lord, rebuke me not in thy indignation, nor chastise me in thy wrath."

Read that again, slowly, because most men read it wrong. He is not asking God to leave him alone. He is not asking to skip the correction. He is asking that the correction come from a Father and not from a Judge in fury. He has already conceded that he has it coming. What he cannot survive is receiving it from a God who is finished with him.

Then he tells you what the last few weeks have been. "My bones are troubled." "My soul is troubled exceedingly." And then his sentence simply falls apart in his mouth: "but thou, O Lord, how long?" No verb. No object. He runs out of words in the middle of the line.

Then the seventh verse, and it is not poetic, it is a man's actual night: "I have laboured in my groanings, every night I will wash my bed: I will water my couch with my tears." That is 2 a.m. That is lying flat in the dark doing arithmetic on your own life.

And then, without one thing on the outside changing - he is still sick, still surrounded, still ashamed - the psalm turns: "for the Lord hath heard the voice of my weeping."

He was heard. That is the whole hinge. Not fixed. Heard. And a man who knows he was heard can get up.

Lord, hear the voice of my weeping tonight, and correct me as a son. Amen.

If someone asks you

Psalm 6:6 proves the Old Testament had no afterlife - heaven was bolted on later

Your own inspired psalm says it in plain words: "there is no one in death, that is mindful of thee: and who shall confess to thee in hell?" That is not poetry doing something clever. It is an argument, and the argument only works if it is true - the man is telling God that killing him is a net loss to the divine ledger, because after death he will be neither aware of God nor able to praise Him. The same picture runs through the older strata of the Hebrew Bible: Sheol is a dust-pit where everyone goes and nothing happens, and Ecclesiastes and Job say much the same. Then, centuries later, under Persian and Greek influence, a fully articulated afterlife with judgment, reward, and punishment appears - and Christianity retrofits it onto texts that plainly did not have it. You are not reading Scripture. You are reading a later theology back into an earlier book and calling the seam "development."

Grant the honest part immediately: the doctrine of the afterlife is not fully articulated in the earliest layers of the Old Testament. That is not a Catholic embarrassment. It is Catholic teaching. Revelation is progressive - God did not hand Israel the Catechism at Sinai; He formed a people over centuries and disclosed Himself at the pace they could receive. The Church has never claimed Psalm 6 contains the treatise on the last things.

Now the distinction the objection collapses. Sheol - Greek hades, Latin infernus, and the Douay's "hell" in this verse - is not the hell of the damned and never was. It is the state of the dead before the redemption, and Christian faith holds precisely that Christ went there and broke it open: He descended to the dead, and the just who had died before Him were not lost but waiting (CCC 632-633). Psalm 6:6 describes a real condition truthfully. It describes the condition Christ came to end. Reading it as a permanent metaphysical claim is like reading a letter from a besieged city as proof that the siege is eternal.

And on the retrofit charge: what actually happened is the reverse of a retrofit. The Church did not delete Psalm 6:6 or explain it away. She kept it in the Psalter, still prays it in the Office, and lets it stand in its own voice - and she put it first among the seven penitential psalms rather than last. Meanwhile the definitive doctrine is defined elsewhere and defined hard: Benedictus Deus (1336) settles that the soul faces judgment immediately at death. A tradition that was quietly papering over an inconvenient verse would have stopped praying it.

Say it out loud: Sheol isn't hell and it isn't oblivion - it's the waiting the Resurrection ended, and we still pray the verse instead of hiding it.

"Let all my enemies be ashamed" is vengeance, and Christ commanded the opposite

Set the two texts side by side and you cannot square them. Christ: love your enemies, do good to them that hate you, pray for them that persecute you. The psalmist: let my enemies be ashamed, let them be very much troubled, let them be turned back and ashamed *speedily* - he wants it, and he wants it fast. This is a man asking God to be his instrument against people he is angry at, and it is not an isolated verse; the Psalter is full of it, up to and including a blessing on whoever dashes infants against rocks. Either Jesus corrected the Old Testament - in which case your Scripture is not one book and your God changed His mind about how to treat people - or you are going to tell me the words do not mean what they say. Christians have been reciting this psalm for sixteen hundred years while praying "forgive us as we forgive." Pick one.

Three things, and the first is philological rather than rhetorical - which also means I have to be careful not to claim more than the words carry.

First, look at the verb, and look at it honestly. The closing line in Latin is convertantur et erubescant valde velociter - "let them be turned and be ashamed very speedily." The Hebrew is yashuvu, from the root shuv, to turn or turn back. Its plain sense in a line about enemies is "let them turn back" - retreat, be driven off. I am not going to pretend the lexicon forces "be converted," because it does not, and a man who tells you otherwise has handed the argument away. But note two things it does carry. That same root is what the psalmist asked of God four verses earlier - Convertere, Domine, "Turn to me, O Lord" (v.5) - so the psalm opens and closes on one verb: turn toward me; let them be turned. And shuv is the standard Hebrew verb for repentance. The line is genuinely open in the direction of conversion, which is why the tradition read it that way.

Second, the Hebrew of the last verse also reuses the word for the psalmist's own collapse. "Be very much troubled" is yibbahalu, from bahal - the identical root used twice at the top of the psalm for his own state: his bones nivhalu (v.3), his soul nivhalah (v.4). He is not asking that something be done to his enemies that has not been done to him. He is asking that they be brought to the exact place he is standing - undone, shaken, out of options - because that is the place where, four verses later, God hears a man.

Third, this is not a modern rescue operation, and I can name the sources. Haydock lists three standing senses of the verse and credits them: "This is a prophecy, (St. Augustine) or a prayer for their speedy and earnest conversion, (St. Jerome; Calmet) or a threat if they persist." That is a standard nineteenth-century Catholic commentary putting the conversion reading in Jerome's mouth. Augustine himself, centuries earlier, offers it plainly: "let them be turned to God, and be ashamed that they sometime gloried in the former darkness of their sins" - and elsewhere in the same exposition reads the enemies as the soul's own disordered appetites. Not personal revenge, in either case.

And under all of it: the Church prays the Psalter in Christ. The Head prays these psalms with the Body. When Christ prays "let my enemies be ashamed," He is asking that everything set against God be exposed and brought down - and the record of what He actually did to His enemies is Calvary, where He asked the Father to forgive them. The desire that evil be shamed is charity, provided you want the evil shamed and the man saved. The alternative - a religion with no desire that wickedness be stopped - is not gentleness. It is indifference dressed up as mercy.

Say it out loud: The verb is "turn" - the same verb he used four verses earlier asking God to turn toward him - and Jerome, Augustine and Haydock all read it as a prayer that his enemies be turned too.

Heard is not the same as fixed - and heard is enough to get up on.

The Study and Ad Fontes

This passage also carries two deeper layers inside the app — The Study (context, typology, Haydock, the Fathers, the Catechism) and Ad Fontes (the Fathers at length, Aquinas, the original languages, and what the Church binds versus what she leaves open). Those are part of the Brotherhood Pass, $8.99 a month. This page and every answer above stay free.

Take up the Brotherhood Pass · What The Scriptorium is · The whole plan